The spread of Corona was slowed by masks

The spread of Corona was slowed by masks

by Katrin Tominski, MDR WISSEN

November 14, 2023, 10:41 am

The issue of masks has certainly been one of the most controversial of the Covid-19 pandemic and after. Do masks do anything or not? The researchers have now presented a new comprehensive study. The result is very clear: yes.

It has been and is the subject of heated debate: the question of whether or not masks can prevent the spread of the coronavirus. A team led by New York scientist Shama Cash-Goldwasser has published a new comprehensive study. The researchers analyzed several high-quality observational studies. The result: face masks can limit the spread of coronaviruses. “Available data support the use of masks in the population to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2,” the researchers write.

Masks protect: the fight against future pandemics will also depend on the use of this knowledge, the researchers explain.
Image rights: IMAGO / Becker&Bredel

According to the study, these findings should serve as a basis for future management of epidemics and pandemics caused by respiratory viruses. “The effectiveness of the measures will depend at least in part on using lessons learned from the Covid-19 pandemic. High-quality masks made widely available could also play an important role in containing pathogens in future pandemics,” the researchers wrote.

Available data support the use of masks in the community to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Shama Cash-Goldwasser | Lead author of the new overall study

Masks tested on planes, in schools and at home

The researchers analyzed several observational studies on the effects of masks on airplanes, in schools, and in household and community contacts. They say a Covid-19 outbreak on the aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt early in the pandemic, before crew members could develop immunity, was instructive. “More than 80% of those who said they did not wear a mask were infected,” the scientists write. “In contrast, those who said they were wearing a mask were 30% less likely to be infected.” Because people on board ships often live together for long periods of time in confined, poorly ventilated spaces, the risk of developing respiratory diseases is generally high.

There weren’t enough masks, especially at the beginning of the pandemic. Only later was the obligation to wear masks introduced to stop the coronavirus.
Image rights: dpa

The type and fit of the mask affects transmission

However, scientists admit: even the best masks do not offer complete protection. Effectiveness depends on many factors. “The benefits of masking are limited if masks are not worn wherever transmission occurs.” For example, healthcare workers who consistently wear masks when working with patients could still become infected if the mask is removed, during breaks, or during conversations with colleagues. Additionally, both mask type and fit are crucial to effectiveness.

Masks can minimize the risk of contracting respiratory viruses. After the pandemic, some people in Germany are still using these findings.
Image rights: IMAGO / Christian Grube

Conceptual mask tested in the laboratory

According to the study, laboratory studies have shown that masks can substantially reduce infectious respiratory droplets and aerosols. Human breathing was simulated and the use of cloth masks, surgical masks and N95 respirators was tested using various techniques. “The reduction in droplet and aerosol spread is greatest when both the source and the exposed person are masked,” the researchers write. According to the study, N95 respirators have the highest filtration performance. They have been shown to provide the best protection against the transmission of coronaviruses.

In reality, everyone knows this, but now it has been scientifically confirmed once again: surgical masks protect more than fabric masks but less than FFP2 masks and N95 respirators.
Image rights: dpa

Study classification

The overall study “Masks during pandemics caused by respiratory pathogens: evidence and implications for action” analyzed several so-called individual observational studies. In these studies, the conditions are not influenced by the researchers. In return, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) work with an experimental group and a control group using placebos.

However, in their overview analysis, researchers led by Shama Cash-Goldwasser intentionally focused “only” on the observational studies published so far. “Randomized trials and meta-analyses may have significant limitations and should not be the sole or even primary basis for public health decisions,” the researchers wrote. “Such studies are by no means the gold standard for demonstrating the effectiveness of all measures.” On the contrary: Disagreement over whether masks reduce the spread of the coronavirus has increased due to the focus on randomized trials. Unfortunately, these are “limited in number, scope, and statistical significance,” the researchers explain.

What are observational studies?In an observational study, a group of people is observed for a period of time without researchers directing or controlling conditions. This also includes many studies that look at the effects of certain drugs or measures in the real world. Often a problem is that external influences, so-called intervening factors, can never be ruled out with 100% certainty. Many experts, for example from the Health Foundation, believe that randomized controlled trials have more evidence. On the one hand the influencing factors are carefully monitored and on the other hand there are comparison groups. Such randomized controlled trials are not always possible. Among other things there are ethical considerations: for example, it is considered unacceptable to intentionally expose study participants to cigarette smoke to investigate the effects on the development of cancer.

What do the latest studies say?

Only in June this year did the study “Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses” conducted by the renowned Cochrane research network cause a stir. It states among other things: “The use of masks in the population probably has little or no influence on the onset of influenza-like or COVID-19-like illnesses compared to the non-use of masks.”

Some people doubt the effectiveness of masks and say that mandating masks is an unnecessary restriction.
Image rights: dpa

Opponents of masks have interpreted this statement to mean that masks do not protect against coronavirus infection. The Cochrane Research Network quickly commented: “Most studies are older and concern the transmission of influenza and other cold viruses; studies on the corona pandemic remain in the minority.” And in the study itself, the researchers pointed out: “The risk of bias in RCTs and cluster RCTs was usually high or unclear.”

Most of the studies are older and relate to the transmission of influenza and other cold viruses; studies on the coronavirus pandemic remain in the minority

Cochrane Network statement on their study in June 2023

The fight against pandemics must be at multiple levels

Despite all the successful reports of mask wearing, the researchers of the current New York study make clear: “In any pandemic or epidemic, wearing masks is only one of many measures.” The most effective strategies involved “a multi-tiered response, including vaccination (where available), isolation of infected individuals, and protection through risk reduction, including the use of high-quality masks.

The Japanese use more masks

The Japanese seem to have better understood that masks help contain diseases. Because, as a study by Osaka University finds, Japan had the highest mask use rates in the world during the Covid pandemic. And even after the pandemic, the Japanese do not abandon their beloved masks. “Our online survey shows that 59% of Japanese participants still wear masks even after the legal status of Covid-19 was downgraded,” explains Michio Murakami, author of the study published in the International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. However, Murakami also writes that even before the pandemic, 67% of Japanese wore a mask. In April and June 2023, 291 people aged between 20 and 69 participated in the survey.

The Japanese also wear breathing masks during a marathon, like here in Kumamoto.
Image rights: imago images / Kyodo News

Masks as a means to reduce fears

But what drives the Japanese to wear masks even without medical necessity? In his study, Murakami found that Japanese people also wear masks for socio-psychological reasons. “A common reason is what we call ‘relief.’ Wearing a mask reduces anxiety for many people,” explains Murakami. A second reason is the norm. “People wear masks because they see others wearing masks.”


more on the topic

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *